![]() Really? If Mr Case were a football manager, those comments might be interpreted as "the dreaded vote of confidence" from the club chairman and prompt chants of "sacked in the morning…" from opposing fans.īut that's a cynical view, of course. He's done a great job and he looks forward to working with him "for a very long time to come", Mr Sunak said. That's prompted a backlash from senior civil servants, who've accused him of "naivety and inexperience" and claims that Mr Case is considering an early departure from his role, after the WhatsApps also infuriated Tory MPs.īut from the man he claimed was "going bonkers", who's now the prime minister, the praise couldn’t have been more gushing. In the leaked Covid WhatsApps, it was revealed that Mr Case said Boris Johnson was "a nationally distrusted figure" and Rishi Sunak - then chancellor - was "going bonkers" for opposing restrictions on business. The Case for the prosecution has become deafening, almost. Since the Matt Hancock WhatsApp pantomime, the knives have been out for the beleaguered Cabinet Secretary, Simon Case. "The convention explicitly recognises that refugees may be compelled to enter a country of asylum irregularly." "This would be a clear breach of the Refugee Convention and would undermine a longstanding humanitarian tradition of which the British people are rightly proud," the statement reads.ĭenying people who arrive in small boats access to asylum on the basis that they haven't come through a safe and legal route "undermines the very purpose" for which the convention was established, the agency says. The bill would deny protection to many people seeking safety and remove their chance to make a case for asylum, it adds. It said the proposed laws would extinguish "the right to seek refugee protection in the UK for those who arrive irregularly, no matter how genuine and compelling their claim may be, and with no consideration of their individual circumstances". The UNHCR released a statement today saying that it is "profoundly concerned" by the new immigration bill. The UK should look to other countries to negotiate deals and arrangements for transfers of asylum seekers or for the return of people who don't need international protection, Mr Saltmarsh says. He added that fighting people smuggling gangs crossing the Channel is "fundamental". "There are so few safe passages for refugees and asylum seekers that unfortunately.so many people are forced to take these perilous journeys." He says that are "very few other means of people arriving safely". ![]() Mr Saltmarsh said the UNHCR does not believe the approach is "fair" and it has "serious concerns" around the rights of people fleeing war persecution. Speaking to Sky News this evening, Matthew Saltmarsh, a spokesperson for the agency, said the government is "introducing a ban on asylum" in breach of the Refugee Convention. ![]() UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, says "today is a sad day for refugee rights" after the government unveiled its plans to tackle small boats crossing the Channel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |